![]() ![]() If you go look around the hall of fame on that site, or just take a look at the contest winners, it's absolutely insane how subtle some of those exploits are. To be more specific, it should perform some specific underhanded task that will not be detected by examining the source code. In this contest you must write C code that is as readable, clear, innocent and straightforward as possible, and yet it must fail to perform at its apparent function. >The Underhanded C Contest is an annual contest to write innocent-looking C code implementing malicious behavior. The "underhanded C contest" is a good example of this and something I like to point people to. ![]() I wouldn't be so sure that it's an inevitability that things would be caught. With such a system, anyone can perform an audit, and people can make their own decisions about what they want to trust. A user should be able to easily inspect the known "curator statements" for an app for the curators the subscribe to, and be able to run a "git fsck"-style validation that proves "this app really is the version that: passed the EFF's 'No Tracking' audit, is on reviewer Carol's 'Recommended' list, was rated "Teen" by the ESRB, and is on my friend Dave's 'Cool stuff you should try' list. Publish lists of these (maybe RSS-ish style?), with sort of browsable/searchable/app-store-ish UI.Ī key feature is verification. The core component is a crypto-signed statement like: Instead of trying to solve the problem of malicious software with a walled garden app store, anyone should be able to publish their own curated list of software (or any type of project?). This extension can store an unlimited amount of client-side data.A prerequisite of that type of badge that I really wish existed is a standardized, interoperable protocol for curation.This extension can access your tabs and browsing activity.This extension will add a panel to the sidebar.This extension can manipulate privacy-related settings.This extension can access your data on some websites.This extension can access your data on all websites.So if ever you really do want to contribute something, think about the people working hard to maintain the filter lists you are using, which were made available to use by all for free. Without the preset lists of filters, this extension is nothing. Yet, even after adding Fanboy's two extra lists, hpHosts’s Ad and tracking servers, uBlock still has a lower memory footprint than other very popular blockers out there.Īlso, be aware that selecting some of these extra lists may lead to higher likelihood of web site breakage - especially those lists which are normally used as hosts file. Of course, the more filters enabled, the higher the memory footprint. More lists are available for you to select if you wish: Out of the box, these lists of filters are loaded and enforced: ![]() It applies to the current web site only, it is not a global power button.įlexible, it's more than an "ad blocker": it can also read and create filters from hosts files. Usage: The big power button in the popup is to permanently disable/enable uBlock for the current web site. An efficient blocker: easy on memory and CPU footprint, and yet can load and enforce thousands more filters than other popular blockers out there. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |